In our site: 
Lithuanian page about Roger Boscovich: 
Conspiracy of Unified field theory 

The anti-UFO Belief espoused by the Mainstream Science Community
is a Religion. 

Just on border of the city of Zagreb (Yugoslavia) a modern glass and concrete building is named Boscovich Institute. There is being performed a research in physics and chemistry. In a garden there is a bronze statue, by famous sculptor Mestrovic, of a figure wearing priest's robes and deep in thought with his elbow on a globe. The inscription reads 'Rugjer Josip Boskovic 1711 - 87.'

But only a few of the older school of physics remember having heard of Boscovichian atoms. As noted per David Deutsch - Theoretical physicists ignore their History. Yet, 60 years ago, and for 150 years before that, Boscovich had been widely known as a natural philosopher and astronomer.

"Boscovich's theory was 200 years ahead of its time and could not be properly appreciated until modern ideas on relativity and quantum theory had replaced the billiard - balls and elastic jellies of the last century." – we can read in 'New Scientist 6 March 1958'.

The Greatest Theoretical Physicist was Roger Boscovich. He was 18th century Jesuit who proposed an Unified Field. He was Helmholtz and Kelvin. Boscovich is the missing link between Newton's ideas and Einstein's ideas. Without him the physics community present the fiction that Einstein's ideas come forth with no precedent. It is quite a mysterious gap that Academia hardly ever mentions him. The real lineage of tradition could be: Newton - Boscovich - Einstein - Tesla.

"Boskovic, Rudjer J ( 1711 - 1787) ... perhaps last polymath to figure in an important way in the history of science, and his career was in consequence something of an anachronism... He was disappointed by the negative attitude that a number of Jesuit philosophers - Peripatetics he thought them to be - adopted toward his own system of natural philosophy..", Dictionary of Scientific Biography vol II, 1970

"The omniverse / multiverse goes back to Boscovich and earlier". New Scientist 24 May 1997

Book of Boscovich 'Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis' (1758) developed a theory of matter as consisting of many dimensionless points, with the mutual attraction of any pair of points being some general function of the distance between them, represented by an oscillatory curve. He considered an oscillary curve of such a form that 'there can, so to speak, arise from them any number of universes, each of them being similar to the other, or dissimilar .. and this too in such a way that no one of them has any communication with any other.. and such that all the universe of smaller dimensions taken together would act merely as a single point compared with the next greater universe, which would consist of little point- masses, so to speak, of the same kind compared with itself.' Boscovich's book has directly influenced many later scientists, and it continues to be much admired. His many scientific achievements include the first proposal for a scientific theory of parallel universes."

Brian Greene in The Elegant Universe p 380 while talking about Superstring theory says: "The mathematical formalism describing string theory begins with equations that describe the motion of a tiny, infinitely thin piece of classical thread - equations that, to a large extent, Newton could have written down some three hundred years ago. These equations are then quantised."

String theory could have been discovered if someone had foresight, three hundred years ago. Boscovich was that man. So, a theory more than two hundred years old and being like Modern Superstring theory is not too unreasonable. But it is not quite the same as the modern version, because as Greene says what happens for the modern version is that 'these equations are then quantised.' I say the quantisation is wrong, as per Einstein's claim. And Einstein was never disproved in this, merely "debunked."

Popular science history dismisses Boscovich as 'anachronism' his theory was too advanced for the 18th century, and a 200 year old theory more advanced than modern physics is not something that Theorists are able to put their mind - sets around, thus 'blind spot.'

A theory was developed that life did not evolve on earth and came to earth from space, possibly seeded from comet debris. Then life is abundant throughout the universe and is not unique to Earth. Boscovich's theory tells us that interstellar space travel is easy for a sufficiently technologically advanced civilization. Add these two theories together and you have: ET visits are extremely likely.

There are a lot of scientists that are religious, some try to get science to agree with their religion, others are supposed to do science without letting their religious beliefs influence their work. My contention is that they are 'all' influencing their science work from their 'religious beliefs'. 'They' want science to agree with their religious beliefs. And their religion is to turn a 'blind spot' to the answer to UFOs. Hence the reason why things like Boscovich get rubbed out from their version of History. 'They' are blind to evidence that contradicts their religious belief, and try to rework what 'they' have as science to fit their religion.

The efforts of Einstein in 1919 fitted within a unified theory of physics, which many physicists were working from, based upon extending Newtonian theory along the lines of Roger Boscovich. After the Quantum revolution, there was no longer a unified theory of physics taught, and Boscovich was written out of the popular version of Establishment physics.

No experiment was ever done that disproved Boscovich's unified theory. The theory was valid up into the 1920, but was replaced by what has become Modern Physics Theory. Conclusion: Modern Physics Theory is a Religion, in the same way that we have religions in all other areas of science masquerading as science

Text prepared by Cpt.Astera's advisor

Your notes and messages you can leave at end of main (in English) san-taka station page.

Literature

1. Roger Joseph Boscovich S.J., F.R.S., 1711 - 1787 Studies of his life and works on the 250th Anniversary of his birth, edited by Lancelot Law Whyte, foreword by Sir Harold Hartley, UK 1961
2. 1760 - Estratto della Litteratura Europea, Bern. Vol IV, pp. 3-29.
3. 1787 J. J. de Lalande Eloge. J. de Paris. 13 Mars.
4. 1787 B. Zamagna Oratio in funere R.J.B. Ragusa.
5. 1792 J. J, de Lalande Eloges. J. des Scavans. Paris. Febr. pp. 113-18.
6. 1880 F. Evellin Quid de rebus . , . Boscovich. Thesis. Paris. 1889 Lord Kelvin On Boscovich's Theory. British Assoc. Reports. p. 494.
7. 1907 - Catholic Encyclopaedia. N.Y. Article on R.J.B.
8. 1909 M.Oster R.J.B. als Naturphilosoph. Inaug. Dissert. Bonn.
9. 1914 S, Ristitsch R.J.B. Vierteljahrschrtft f. Wiss. Phil, 38, p. 82.
10. 1917 B. Petronievic R.J.B. Article in Slav Achievement in Science. London.
11. 1918 C. Stojanovic R.J.B. Revue Scientifique. p. 456.
12. 1922 D. NedeljkoviC La philosphie naturelle et relativiste de R.J.B. Paris.
13. 1922 - Reviews of 1922 Edition of Thearia in Times Litt. Supp, (Dec. 14) and Nature (Dec. 30).
14. 1924 V, VariCak Important 60-page review of 1922 Theoria, in English. Bullet. d. Trav. d. l. Cl. d Sciences Math. et Nat., Acad. des Sciences et des Arts des Slaves du Sud du Zagreb. pp. 45-102. Zagreb. Also, Review of recent works. pp. 727-30.
15. 1929 L. Cermelj R.J.B. aIs relativist. Arch. f. Gesch. d. Math. 11, p. 424. (Joje yra ištraukų iš Boskovičiaus lotyniškų rašinių apie laiką ir erdvę vertimas į vokiečių kalbą)
16. 1931 H. Bedarida Amities francaises du pere Boscovich a Paris. 1937 G. Nikolic R.J.B., 150e anniversaire de la mort. Bull. Soc. Astr. Franc. 51, p. 91.
17. 1937 D. UranoviC B.'s anticipation of high densities. Observatory. 60, p.76.
18. 1941 H. V. Gill R.J.B. Forerunner of Modern Physical Theories. Dublin.
19. 1942 H. C. Plummer Review of Gill. Nature. 49, p. 180.
20. 1949 - Enciclopedia Cattolica. Rome. Article on R.J.B. 1951 J. Feyer Theoriae corpusculares . . . Doctrina de R.J.B. Paris.
21. 1953 B. M. Scully A great but forgotten Jesuit scientist, R.J.B. Modern Humanist. Weston, Mass.
22. 1956 Z. Markovit R.J.B. et les Mathematigues Appliquees. VIIIe Congres International d'Histoire des Sciences. pp. 202-6. Florence.
23. 1957 L, L. Whyte R.J.B. and Particle Theory. Nature. 179, p. 284. 1958 L. L. Whyte R.J.B. and the Mathematics of Atomism. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 13, p. 38.
24. 1958 L. L. Whyte Bicentenary of R.J,B.'s Theoria. (Report of London meeting). Nature. 182, p. 230.
25. 1958 Father F. E. Keegan, S,J. R.J,B. The Month. pp. 340-52.
26. 1958 D. Nedeljkovic Motion and relativity in R.J.B.'s "New World" (English Summary). Serbian 112. Belgrade.
27. 1958 A. L, Mackay New Scientist. March 6th. pp. 17-18.
28. 1959 A. M. Godytsky-Tsvivko The Scientific Ideas of R.J.B. (Russian).
29. Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu ( AHSI ) Rome: Institutum Historicum Bangert, William A History of the Society of Jesus. St. Louis: St. Louis Institute
30. Boyer, Carl A history of mathematics. New York: Wiley, 1968
31. Gillispie, Charles. C. ed., Dictionary of Scientific biography. 16 vols. New York: Charles Scribner and Sons, 1970
32. Sommervogel, Carolus Biblioth?que de la compagnie de Jésus. 12 volumes. Bruxelles: Société Belge de Libraire, 1890-1960
33. Whyte, Lancelot Law Roger Joseph Boscovich,S.J. New York: Fordham Press, 1961 Enciclopedia Treccani, headword Boscovich; B. Marini - La nazionalitą di Ruggero Boscovich - Roma 1970;
34. M Deanovich - I rapporti tra il Voltaire, R. Boscovich e l'Accademia - Godišnjak Svencilišta u Zagrebu (University of Zagreb yearbook) 1929;
35. G. Gozzi - Repubblica di Ragusa - Roma 1974;
36. D. Gaiani - Galleria di Ragusei illustri - Ragusa 1841
37. R.J.Boscovich vita e attivita scientifica. Piazza dell' Enciclopedia Italiana, 1993, pp.281- 306

    Others:

38. 1772 J. Priestley History . . . of discoveries relating to vision, light, and colours. Period VI, pp. 390-1.
39. 1777 J. Priestley Disquisitions relating to matter and spirit, p. 19,
40. 1781 J. J. de Lalande Astronomie, 4, p, 686.
41. 1802 T. Thomson System of Chemistry, 4 vols.
42. 1812 Sir H. Davy Elements of Chemical Philosophy.
43. 1822 J. Robison System of Mechanical Philosophy. Ed. Brewster, 4 vols (Vol I, pp. 267- 339 on R,J.B.).
44. 1831 C, Daubeny Introduction to Atomic Theory. Oxford 1831, 1850.
45. 1844 M. Faraday Phil. Mag,, 24, p. 136. Researches in Electricity. 1844/5. Vol II, p. 244; III, p. 447.
46. 1853 M. Seguin In F.N.M. Moigno's Cosmos, Vol II, p.374.
47. 1854 D. Stewart Collected Works, Vol I, p. 423.
48. 1862 R. Grassmann Die Weltwissenschaft oder Physik, Vol I, pp. 22-5.
49. 1864 G. T. Fechner Uber die Phys. u. Phil. Atomlehre, 2nd ed.
50. 1868 D. Mendeleeff See Principles of Chemistry. London edition. 1905. Vol I, p. 218.
51. 1873 J. W. L. Glaisher Phil. Mag., 46, pp. 102-22.
52. I875 J, Clerk Maxwell Article on Atom in Encycl. Britt. 9th ed., Vol III.
53. 1877 J. Clerk Maxwell Nature, 16, p. 246.
54. 1878 P. S. de Laplace Traire de mecanigue celeste, Vol II, p. 147.
55. 1880 H. L. F. v. Helmholtz Wissenschaftliche Abh, p. 16.
56. 1883 W. Wundt Logik, Vol III, p, 356.
57. 1893 A. Lalande Lectures sur la philosophie des sciences, p. 261. Paris.
58. I893 Lord Kelvin On the elasticity of a crystal according to Boscovich. Proc. Roy. Soc.,8th.
59. 1895 A. Hannequin L'Hypothese des Atomes, p. 100. Paris.
60. 1895 F. Nietzsche Jenseits von Gut und Bose, §l2, p. 22. Aus dem vorreden-Material, Vol XI,
61. 1900 Earl Russell Philosophy of Leibniz, p. 91.
62. 1902 E. v. Hartmann Die Weltanschauung der modernen Physik, p. 180.
63. 1904 Lord Kelvin Baltimore Lectures, pp. 123, 125, 131, 285, 556, 675.
64. 1904 0. Buek Die Atomistik und Faraday's Begriff der Materie. Archiv f. Gesch. d. Philosophie. Berlin. 18, pp. 65, 139.
65. 1905 P. Duliem L'Evolution de la mecanique, pp. 22, 1661.
66. 1905 Lord Kelvin Phil. Mag., 10, p. 695.
67. 1907 J. J. Thomson Corpuscular Theory of Matter, p. 160.
68. 1908 G. Cantor vorl. u. Gesch. d. Math. Vol IV, p. 656.
69. 1909 J. R. Poynting Atomic Theory. Reprinted in Collected Scientific Papers. 1920. p. 724. 1822 J. Robison
70. 19I0 Lord Kelvin See S. P. Thompson, Life of William Thomson, Vol II, p. 1077. on R,J.B.).
71. 1911 E. Cassirer Das Erkenntnisproblem, Vol II, pp. 422, 506.
72. 1924 L. Silberstein Theory of Relativity, 2nd ed,, p. 38.
73. 1932 E. Meyerson Identite et Realite, pp. 56, 61, 79, 83, 104, 443.
74. 1940 S. Chapman Nature, 146, p. 607.
75. 1947 E. C. Millington 1949 J. R. Partington 1952 M. Boas
76. 1957 M. Jammer 1959 H. Woolf 1960 A. J. Berry
77. 1960 L. Pearce WilIiams Annals of Science, 5, pp, 352-72. Advanced Physical Chemistry, Vol I, p. 732.
78. Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy. Osiris, 10, p. 524. Concepts of Force, pp. 170-8,
79. Transits of Venus. A Study of XVIIIth Century Science, pp. 45, 88, 141n, 163. Henry Cavendish, p. 92.
80. Michael Faraday and the Evolution of the Concept of Electric and Magnetic Forces. Proc. Roy. Inst. 38 II (No. 171). 1960.
81. Humphry Davy. Scientific American. June 1960. pp. 106-16. 3.

san-taka station We are ready to meet all phenomena hard to explain what happen in the night sky and other fields of nature and seen in the dreams, even. All your notices, questions and messages You can send by E-mail: san-taka@lithuanian.net or to leave at end of this page.

UFO sightings and other phenomenas in/under Lithuanian sky. Please inform us about everything you noticed and find unexplainable in the night sky or even during your night dreams, or in the other fields of life. Review of our site in English